Coleman v. State

437 So. 2d 1055, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5874
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 30, 1983·No. 1 Div. 428·Published

Opinion

TYSON, Judge.

This case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, for a sentencing hearing. Coleman v. State, 424 So.2d 685 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). In strict compliance with the order of this court that a new sentencing be held, such was set at which appellant and his counsel were present.

The State introduced into evidence two certified copies of judgments of conviction showing that Coleman, the appellant, had been previously convicted in 1969 of grand larceny, for which he received a year and a day sentence and had a conviction in 1973 of receiving stolen property, for which he received a sentence of three years’ imprisonment.

After these two convictions were placed in evidence before the circuit court, the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment pursuant to the provisions of § 13A-5-9(b)(3), which requires that the appellant be imprisoned “for life or for any term of not less than 99 years.”

A supplemental transcript showing this resentencing, including the certified copies of the two previous convictions, was filed in this court.

I

The appellant now contends that this mandatory sentencing under the Alabama Habitual Offender Statute is unconstitutional as being cruel and unusual punishment, by retroactively imposing additional punishment for offenses previously committed. This contention has been expressly rejected by this court in the following cases: Seritt v. State, 401 So.2d 248 (Ala.Cr.App.1981), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 251 (Ala.1981); Smith v. State, 401 So.2d 251 (Ala. Cr.App.1981), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 257 (Ala.1981); Bates v. State, 405 So.2d 1334 (Ala.Crim.App.1981), cert. denied, 405 So.2d 1339 (Ala.1981).

Upon consideration of the supplemental transcript which includes the two certified copies of the two previous felony convictions, this case is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 437 So. 2d 1055, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4973 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

437 So. 2d 1055 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Serritt v. State
401 So. 2d 248 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Smith v. State
401 So. 2d 251 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Coleman v. State
424 So. 2d 685 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Bates v. State
405 So. 2d 1334 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Bates v. State
405 So. 2d 1339 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)