Coleman v. Simpson

Fourth Circuit

Coleman v. Simpson

15 F. App'x 184

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. Simpson. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 F. App'x 251 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2001·No. 01-1490·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Monica Coleman appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order granting in part and denying in part the trustees’ motion to compel. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Simpson, Nos. CA-01-3634-L; BK-99-56239-SD; AP-99-56381-SD (D. Md. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Monica Coleman appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order granting in part and denying in part the trustees’ motion to compel. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Simpson, Nos. CA-01-3634-L; BK-99-56239-SD; AP-99-56381-SD (D. Md. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Coleman v. Simpson, 15 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

15 F. App'x 184 (Coleman v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.