Coleman v. Saunders
5 Miss. 287
Opinion
The statute which authorizes this summary proceeding against the sheriff and his sureties, requires-that they shall, have notice of it. None was;,given,and.the judgment is therefore manifestly erroneous. 1 Walker’s Rep. 254.
Let the judgment be reyersed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. Saunders, 5 Miss. 287 (Mich. 1840).
5 Miss. 287 (Coleman v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.