Coleman v. Ruple
17 A. 193, 1 Monag. 294, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1324
Opinion
The court below was entirely ri^ht in refusing to open, tliis judgment. The reasons for such •refusal are so fully set forth in the opinion of the. learned judge .who heard the case, that we are relieved from any discussion-of it.
The order is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of .the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. Ruple, 17 A. 193, 1 Monag. 294, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1324 (Pa. 1889).
17 A. 193 (Coleman v. Ruple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lazarus v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.
92 A. 121 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)