Coleman v. Rivera
This text of Coleman v. Rivera (Coleman v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8066
KEITH G. COLEMAN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:09-cv-00805-RBH)
Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith G. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Keith G. Coleman, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Rivera, No.
9:09-cv-00805-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2009). We deny the motion
for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coleman v. Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-rivera-ca4-2011.