Coleman v. Rivera

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
Docket09-8066
StatusUnpublished

This text of Coleman v. Rivera (Coleman v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Rivera, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8066

KEITH G. COLEMAN,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:09-cv-00805-RBH)

Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith G. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith G. Coleman, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Rivera, No.

9:09-cv-00805-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2009). We deny the motion

for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Coleman v. Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-rivera-ca4-2011.