Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions

563 F. App'x 264
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1013
StatusPublished

This text of 563 F. App'x 264 (Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, 563 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin C. Coleman appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order of dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, No. 1:13-cv-02400-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2013). Further, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 [265]*265F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc) (stating standard of review). We grant Coleman leave to proceed in forma pauper-is. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aikens v. Ingram
652 F.3d 496 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 F. App'x 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-residential-credit-solutions-ca4-2014.