Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions

563 F. App'x 264
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2014·No. No. 14-1013·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin C. Coleman appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order of dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, No. 1:13-cv-02400-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2013). Further, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 [265] F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc) (stating standard of review). We grant Coleman leave to proceed in forma pauper-is. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, 563 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014).

563 F. App'x 264 (Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aikens v. Ingram
652 F.3d 496 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)