Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions
This text of 563 F. App'x 264 (Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Edwin C. Coleman appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order of dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, No. 1:13-cv-02400-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2013). Further, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 [265]*265F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc) (stating standard of review). We grant Coleman leave to proceed in forma pauper-is. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 F. App'x 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-residential-credit-solutions-ca4-2014.