Coleman v. Reierson
This text of 30 N.W. 811 (Coleman v. Reierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To enable this court to consider the objection that the evidence does not sustain the verdict, it is necessary for the settled statement of the case to show that it contains all the evidence .on the matter as to which it is objected that the evidence is insufficient. This may appear either from the judge’s certificate or in the body of the “case.” Here there is contained in it a statement or certificate signed by the official reporter that the case contains all the .evidence. This statement became a part of the case by being left in [223]*223'when settled. The evidence is not entirely satisfactory; but we think it was such that the jury might, in the fair exercise of their judgments, .arrive at the verdict found by them.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 N.W. 811, 36 Minn. 222, 1886 Minn. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-reierson-minn-1886.