Coleman v. . Pleystead
This text of 40 N.Y. 341 (Coleman v. . Pleystead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the opinion of JusticeBacoh, in the case of Bergen v. Bradley and others (36 N. Y. R, 316), as to an appeal, is to be regarded as the decision of this court, it is decisive of this ease. As to the appeal, this case is in precisely the condition that was.
It is clear, fi’om that opinion, that this action is not before this court in such a form as to admit of review.
There is nothing shown by the report of that case, that on that question it was not the opinion of the court. It must be so regarded. In accordance therewith, this appeal should be dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed.
D. B. JProsser, for respondents.
D. J. BunderUn, for appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 N.Y. 341, 1869 N.Y. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-pleystead-ny-1869.