Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.

17 Misc. 2d 873, 186 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3657

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 21, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs have failed to present a valid excuse for the delay of 2 years and 11 months in failing to place the case upon the Trial Calendar after the joinder of issue. It is clear that this is the typical case of delay condemned by the Appellate Division in Lakowits v. Marlin Gardens (5 A D 2d 981).

The order appealed from should be modified by eliminating therefrom the conditional provision allowing plaintiffs to transfer the case to the Municipal Court, and as modified the order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs have failed to present a valid excuse for the delay of 2 years and 11 months in failing to place the case upon the Trial Calendar after the joinder of issue. It is clear that this is the typical case of delay condemned by the Appellate Division in Lakowits v. Marlin Gardens (5 A D 2d 981).

The order appealed from should be modified by eliminating therefrom the conditional provision allowing plaintiffs to transfer the case to the Municipal Court, and as modified the order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp., 17 Misc. 2d 873, 186 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

17 Misc. 2d 873 (Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related