Coleman v. North Carolina

671 F. App'x 131
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2016·No. No. 16-1789·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Coleman appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. North Carolina, No. 2:15-cv-00035-D, 2016 WL 3640614 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. North Carolina, 671 F. App'x 131 (4th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 131 (Coleman v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)