Coleman v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Coleman v. New York Life Ins. Co.

1934 OK 707, 44 P.2d 880, 170 Okla. 128, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 697

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 11, 1934

Docket25790

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK 707 (Coleman v. New York Life Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. New York Life Ins. Co., 1934 OK 707, 44 P.2d 880, 170 Okla. 128, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 697 (Okla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendants in error were plaintiffs in the lower court, and will be so designated in this opinion.

Plaintiffs filed their petition June IS, 1932, seeking a judgment on a promissory note and foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same, and, under date of February 3, 1933, the judgment of the court was entered, granting judgment to the plaintiff as prayed and ordering foreclosure of real estate. The appeal is by transcript and purported bill of exceptions, but none of the evidence, if any was introduced, is shown, and no exception to the judgment of the court is made, and the only objection in the record to the order of the court overruling the motion to vacate the order approving sale. No evidence is in the record which shows what basis the court entered its order denying the application to set aside the sale, or what errors were committed, if any.

This court has held that where, upon examination of the record, the assignments of error, and the motion to dismiss, the appeal is manifestly without merit and taken for delay only, the same will be dismissed. Wetumka Ice Corporation v. Williams, 163 Okla. 169, 21 P. (2d) 742; Johnson v. Mills Produce Co.., 163 Okla. 121, 21 P. (2d) 1053; Semler v. State, 163 Okla. 58, 20 P. (2d) 1041.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendants in error were plaintiffs in the lower court, and will be so designated in this opinion.

Plaintiffs filed their petition June IS, 1932, seeking a judgment on a promissory note and foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same, and, under date of February 3, 1933, the judgment of the court was entered, granting judgment to the plaintiff as prayed and ordering foreclosure of real estate. The appeal is by transcript and purported bill of exceptions, but none of the evidence, if any was introduced, is shown, and no exception to the judgment of the court is made, and the only objection in the record to the order of the court overruling the motion to vacate the order approving sale. No evidence is in the record which shows what basis the court entered its order denying the application to set aside the sale, or what errors were committed, if any.

This court has held that where, upon examination of the record, the assignments of error, and the motion to dismiss, the appeal is manifestly without merit and taken for delay only, the same will be dismissed. Wetumka Ice Corporation v. Williams, 163 Okla. 169, 21 P. (2d) 742; Johnson v. Mills Produce Co.., 163 Okla. 121, 21 P. (2d) 1053; Semler v. State, 163 Okla. 58, 20 P. (2d) 1041.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK 707, 44 P.2d 880, 170 Okla. 128, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-new-york-life-ins-co-okla-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack