Coleman v. Neal
This text of 8 Ga. 560 (Coleman v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court
delivering the opinion,
[562]*562By reference to the return made by the Inferior Court to the mandamus nisi, obtained against them by Neal, to show cause why these orders should not be issued by them, in compliance with their contract, it will be found that they resisted the fulfilment of their agreement, upon identically the same ground. Having submitted the issue of fact, thus presented to the Court, instead of to a Jury, as it was the right and privilege of the respondents to have done, and the Judge having made the mandamus absolute, and directed these orders to be issued, notwithstanding the defence which was set up, justice requires — the public tranquility demands — that this litigation, having been fairly and finally determined between these parties, should not be renewed, but closed forever.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ga. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-neal-ga-1850.