Coleman v. Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coleman v. Nassau County

2 A.D.3d 562, 768 N.Y.S.2d 371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 562 (Coleman v. Nassau County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Nassau County, 2 A.D.3d 562, 768 N.Y.S.2d 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered October 18, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint was unintelligible, and lacked specificity and any legally cognizable claim (see Kung v Pan, 285 AD2d 532 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered October 18, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint was unintelligible, and lacked specificity and any legally cognizable claim (see Kung v Pan, 285 AD2d 532 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 562, 768 N.Y.S.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-nassau-county-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack