Coleman v. Mullis
72 S.E. 1099, 10 Ga. App. 175, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 701
This text of 72 S.E. 1099 (Coleman v. Mullis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coleman v. Mullis, 72 S.E. 1099, 10 Ga. App. 175, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 701 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
1. There was no error in overruling the motion to dismiss because of the alleged defects in the process.
2. The answer being insufficient in law to constitute a defense to the note sued on, there was no error in striking it and rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 1099, 10 Ga. App. 175, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-mullis-gactapp-1911.