Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc.

Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc.

212 A.D.2d 971, 624 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1826
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1995
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 971 (Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 971, 624 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff a continuance to respond to the motion for summary judgment of defendant Mettler-Toledo, Inc. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause for a continuance (see, Henderson v Stilwell, 116 AD2d 861, 862, Iv denied 68 NY2d 606; Wallin v Wallin, 34 AD2d 870; Hubbell Elec, v State of New York, 153 Mise 2d 810, 813-814). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallin v. Wallin
34 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Henderson v. Stilwell
116 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 971, 624 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-mettler-toledo-inc-nyappdiv-1995.