Coleman v. Merritt

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided October 1, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-01566·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01566-JCC-BAT v. ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT C. MERRITT, et al., Defendant.

This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding with this action pro se and in forma pauperis. The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) Service by Clerk The Clerk is directed to send the following to Defendants all of whom are employees of the King County Jail: C. Merritt, Jail Officer; L. Arias, Jail Officer; G. Robinson, corrections supervisor; R. Prioleau, classifications officer; R. Kintner, classifications staff supervisor; I. Idiong, classifications staff; and Hurt, classifications staff, by first class mail: a copy of plaintiff’s complaint, a copy of this Order, two copies of the notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, a waiver of service of summons, and a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the Clerk’s Office. A courtesy copy of the complaint, this order, notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, a waiver of service of summons shall also be provided to the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Civil Litigation Department, 516 Third Avenue, W400, Seattle, WA 98104.

(2) Response Required Defendant(s) shall have thirty (30) days within which to return the enclosed waiver of service of summons. A defendant who timely returns the signed waiver shall have sixty (60) days after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an answer to the complaint or a motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A defendant who fails to timely return the signed waiver will be personally served with a summons and complaint and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (3) Filing and Service by Parties, Generally All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents

electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Counsel are directed to the Court’s website, www.wawd.uscourts.gov, for a detailed description of the requirements for filing via CM/ECF. All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or prisoners, may continue to file a paper original with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed electronically or in traditional paper format, must indicate in the upper right-hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom the document is directed. For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty (50) pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.” Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter.

(4) Motions, Generally Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. The motion shall be noted in accordance with LCR 7(d). Motions including stipulated and agreed motions, motions to file over-length motions or briefs, motions for reconsideration, joint submissions pursuant to the optional procedure established in LCR 37(a)(2), motions for default, requests for the clerk to enter default judgment, ex parte motions, motions to recuse, and

motions for a temporary restraining order shall be noted for consideration on the day they are filed. LCR 7(d)(1). Other non-dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than 21 days from the date of filing. LCR 7(d)(3). All dispositive motions, and motions such as a motion seeking a preliminary injunction or a motion directed toward changing the forum, shall be noted for consideration no earlier than 28 days after filing. LCR 7(d)(4). For electronic filers, any opposition to a non-dispositive motion shall be filed and received by the moving party no later than 15 days after the filing date of the motion, and any reply shall be filed and received by the opposing party no later than 21 days after the filing date of the motion. LCR 7(d)(3). Any opposition to a dispositive motion by an electronic filer shall be filed and received by the moving party no later than 21 days after the filing date of the motion and any reply shall be filed and received by the opposing party no later than 28 days after the filing date of the motion. LCR 7(d)(4). If a party (i.e., a pro se litigant and/or prisoner) serves an opposition by mail, the deadline

for filing and serving such opposition shall be 3 days earlier than the deadlines provided in LCR 7(d)(3) and 7(d)(4). (5) Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment Parties filing motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should acquaint themselves with those rules. As noted above, these motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than 28 days after filing and service of the motion. Defendants filing motions to dismiss or motions for summary judge are advised that they MUST serve Rand and Wyatt notices concurrently with motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment so that pro se prisoner plaintiffs will have fair, timely and adequate notice of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Merritt, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Coleman v. Merritt (Coleman v. Merritt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related