Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission
This text of Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission (Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6739
LEON COLEMAN, a/k/a Mr.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; COMMISSIONER C. BEIKERT; T. HOWELL, #23; COMMISSIONER PATTERSON; ALL PAROLE AGENTS, PAROLE ASSOCIATES, NAMES UNKNOWN,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00749-BEL)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Leon Coleman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Coleman v. Maryland Parole Comm’n,
No. 1:09-cv-00749-BEL (D. Md. April 9, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-maryland-parole-commission-ca4-2009.