Coleman v. Martin

6 F. Cas. 64, 6 Blatchf. 291
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 F. Cas. 64
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 30, 1868·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

Under rule 6G of the rules in equity prescribed by the supreme court, the answer of every defendant, when sufficient, must be replied to, without reference to the state of the cause or of the pleadings in regard to any other defendant. The replication must be a general one. Rule 45 abolishes special replications. Any defendant, whose answer is sufficient, has a right to have the cause, as to him, put at issue, so that he may, under rules 67, 68, and 69, proceed to take his testimony, if he wishes to. But, where the cause is not at issue as to all the defendants, and where it is not proper to compel the plaintiff to go to proofs until it is at issue as to all of them, the court will, on a proper application, enlarge the time, under rule 69, for the plaintiff to take proofs in respect of the defendants as to whom the cause is at issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Martin, 6 F. Cas. 64, 6 Blatchf. 291 (circtsdny 1868).

6 F. Cas. 64 (Coleman v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.