Coleman v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Coleman v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.

862 P.2d 101, 318 Or. 58, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 157

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 18, 1993

DocketWCB 90-16879; CA A75971; SC S40433

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 862 P.2d 101 (Coleman v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Lamb-Weston, Inc., 862 P.2d 101, 318 Or. 58, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 157 (Or. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Neither this court nor the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of this appeal, because the petition for judicial review was not timely served on the Workers’ Compensation Board, as required by ORS 656.298(3). Southwest Forest Industries v. Anders, 299 Or 205, 218-19, 701 P2d 432 (1985). Accordingly, the petition for review is allowed, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Neither this court nor the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of this appeal, because the petition for judicial review was not timely served on the Workers’ Compensation Board, as required by ORS 656.298(3). Southwest Forest Industries v. Anders, 299 Or 205, 218-19, 701 P2d 432 (1985). Accordingly, the petition for review is allowed, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 P.2d 101, 318 Or. 58, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-lamb-weston-inc-or-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack