Coleman v. Kemna

352 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 2011 WL 4444069
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 27, 2011
DocketWD 72842
StatusPublished

This text of 352 S.W.3d 604 (Coleman v. Kemna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Kemna, 352 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 2011 WL 4444069 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Coleman appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing Lawrence Coleman’s petition for judicial review. Lawrence Coleman claims that: (1) the trial court erred in finding that the petition failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because the process by which the Missouri Department of Corrections determines what personal property an inmate may possess constitutes a contested case subject to judicial review; (2) the trial court erred in denying Lawrence Coleman’s request to proceed in forma pauperis because the trial court ordered twenty percent of his monthly income to be paid to the clerk of the court until the full $150 filing fee is satisfied; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to adhere to the federal Prisoner Litigation Reform Act because the trial court ordered twenty percent of Lawrence Coleman’s monthly income to be paid to the clerk of the court even though his monthly income totals less than ten dollars. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carkeek v. Treasurer of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
352 S.W.3d 604 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 2011 WL 4444069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-kemna-moctapp-2011.