Coleman v. Hutcheson, Yeomans & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Coleman v. Hutcheson, Yeomans & Co.

94 S.E. 94, 21 Ga. App. 100, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 452

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 31, 1917

Docket8680

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 94 (Coleman v. Hutcheson, Yeomans & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Hutcheson, Yeomans & Co., 94 S.E. 94, 21 Ga. App. 100, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 452 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial embraces the general grounds only. There is ample evidence to support the verdict; and when the jury has passed, upon the questions of fact, and such questions only are involved, this court will' not interfere with the finding if there is any evidence to support it.

2. The writ of error in this ease is witii&ut merit, and was evidently sued out for delay only. The prayer of the defendants in error that ten per cent, damages be awarded against the plaintiffs in error, as provided in section 6213 of the Civil Code of 1910, is granted.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Broyles, P. J., a/nd Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial embraces the general grounds only. There is ample evidence to support the verdict; and when the jury has passed, upon the questions of fact, and such questions only are involved, this court will' not interfere with the finding if there is any evidence to support it.

2. The writ of error in this ease is witii&ut merit, and was evidently sued out for delay only. The prayer of the defendants in error that ten per cent, damages be awarded against the plaintiffs in error, as provided in section 6213 of the Civil Code of 1910, is granted.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Broyles, P. J., a/nd Harwell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 94, 21 Ga. App. 100, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-hutcheson-yeomans-co-gactapp-1917.