Coleman v. Higginbotham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Coleman v. Higginbotham

861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 285, 2003 WL 1950011

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 25, 2003

Docket2000563

StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 1087 (Coleman v. Higginbotham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Higginbotham, 861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 285, 2003 WL 1950011 (Ala. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court, on December 7, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Colemans’ fraud and tort-of-outrage claims and has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Coleman’s breach-of-contract and conversion claims, and has remanded the cause. Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala.2003). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s judgment relating to the Colemans’ breach-of-contract and conversion claims is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court, on December 7, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Colemans’ fraud and tort-of-outrage claims and has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Coleman’s breach-of-contract and conversion claims, and has remanded the cause. Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala.2003). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s judgment relating to the Colemans’ breach-of-contract and conversion claims is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 285, 2003 WL 1950011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-higginbotham-alacivapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack