Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.

220 So. 2d 365, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2427
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1969
DocketNo. 38042
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 So. 2d 365 (Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc., 220 So. 2d 365, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2427 (Fla. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is denied also.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co. v. Kaplan
220 So. 2d 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 So. 2d 365, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-henry-w-brown-sons-inc-fla-1969.