Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.

220 So. 2d 365, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2427
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 19, 1969·No. No. 38042·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is denied also.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc., 220 So. 2d 365, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2427 (Fla. 1969).

220 So. 2d 365 (Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co. v. Kaplan
220 So. 2d 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)