Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works
113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466
This text of 113 F.2d 935 (Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works, 113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466 (4th Cir. 1939).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed but without prejudice, by agreement of the parties. Order filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-hartsville-print-dye-works-ca4-1939.