Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works

113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1939
DocketNo. 4505
StatusPublished

This text of 113 F.2d 935 (Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Hartsville Print & Dye Works, 113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466 (4th Cir. 1939).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed but without prejudice, by agreement of the parties. Order filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 F.2d 935, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-hartsville-print-dye-works-ca4-1939.