Coleman v. Graff

119 A. 280, 94 N.J. Eq. 223, 9 Stock. 223, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 368
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 22, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 A. 280 (Coleman v. Graff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Graff, 119 A. 280, 94 N.J. Eq. 223, 9 Stock. 223, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

[233]*233For affirmance — The Chief-J ustioe, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Ivalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeniibimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karkus v. Siefert
169 F. Supp. 662 (D. New Jersey, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A. 280, 94 N.J. Eq. 223, 9 Stock. 223, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-graff-nj-1922.