Coleman v. Graff
119 A. 280, 94 N.J. Eq. 223, 9 Stock. 223, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 368
Opinion
The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
[233]*233For affirmance — The Chief-J ustioe, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Ivalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeniibimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. Graff, 119 A. 280, 94 N.J. Eq. 223, 9 Stock. 223, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1922).
119 A. 280 (Coleman v. Graff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Edelson and Harriet Edelson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
829 F.2d 828 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Karkus v. Siefert
169 F. Supp. 662 (D. New Jersey, 1958)