Coleman v. Freedman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Coleman v. Freedman

8 D.C. 160

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 1873

DocketNo. 11,896

StatusPublished

This text of 8 D.C. 160 (Coleman v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Freedman, 8 D.C. 160 (D.C. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

[162]*162By the Court:

Upon the direct authorities cited by the counsel for petitioner sustaining such a use of the writ, the court were all of the opinion that it will lie in this case. And as there is no provision for the removal of cases after a jury-trial by appeal into this court, the proper course is to bring' it here by certiorari when the amount in controversy is evidently within the jurisdiction of the court.

Motion to quash denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[162]*162By the Court:

Upon the direct authorities cited by the counsel for petitioner sustaining such a use of the writ, the court were all of the opinion that it will lie in this case. And as there is no provision for the removal of cases after a jury-trial by appeal into this court, the proper course is to bring' it here by certiorari when the amount in controversy is evidently within the jurisdiction of the court.

Motion to quash denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 D.C. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-freedman-dc-1873.