Coleman v. Freedman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Coleman v. Freedman

8 D.C. 160

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1873·No. No. 11,896·Published

Opinion

[162] By the Court:

Upon the direct authorities cited by the counsel for petitioner sustaining such a use of the writ, the court were all of the opinion that it will lie in this case. And as there is no provision for the removal of cases after a jury-trial by appeal into this court, the proper course is to bring' it here by certiorari when the amount in controversy is evidently within the jurisdiction of the court.

Motion to quash denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[162] By the Court:

Upon the direct authorities cited by the counsel for petitioner sustaining such a use of the writ, the court were all of the opinion that it will lie in this case. And as there is no provision for the removal of cases after a jury-trial by appeal into this court, the proper course is to bring' it here by certiorari when the amount in controversy is evidently within the jurisdiction of the court.

Motion to quash denied.

Coleman v. Freedman, 8 D.C. 160 (D.C. 1873).

Pincite

8 D.C. 160 (Coleman v. Freedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.