Coleman v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coleman v. Frank

274 A.D. 796, 80 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3383

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 796 (Coleman v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Frank, 274 A.D. 796, 80 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when the taxicab in which he was a passenger, owned and operated by defendant Frank, ran into the rear of an automobile owned and operated by defendant Celiano. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants. The court denied a motion by defendant Frank to set aside the verdict as to him, but granted a similar motion by Celiano and set aside the verdict and granted a new trial on the ground that the verdict, as to him, was against the weight of the evidence. Order setting aside verdict against defendant Celiano as against the weight of the evidence and granting a new trial, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. Present— Lewis, P. J., Adel, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when the taxicab in which he was a passenger, owned and operated by defendant Frank, ran into the rear of an automobile owned and operated by defendant Celiano. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants. The court denied a motion by defendant Frank to set aside the verdict as to him, but granted a similar motion by Celiano and set aside the verdict and granted a new trial on the ground that the verdict, as to him, was against the weight of the evidence. Order setting aside verdict against defendant Celiano as against the weight of the evidence and granting a new trial, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs. Present— Lewis, P. J., Adel, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.D. 796, 80 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-frank-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack