Coleman v. Commonwealth

9 Ky. Op. 160, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 374
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 29, 1876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The appellant signed the bail bond. It therefore appears upon the face of that instrument that he undertook that the defendant should appear in the Pendleton Circuit Court to answer any indictment that might be found against him.

The answer states that the appellant surrendered the accused to the jailer of Pendleton county, and that the latter received him into [161] custody, but as the bail cannot lawfully make such a surrender, and as the jailer cannot legally accept the custody of the prisoner until the conditions of Sec. 81 of the Criminal Code of practice have been complied with, the answer was defective in failing to show that the surrender was accompanied with a certified copy of the bail bond. The demurrer was therefore properly sustained.

A. R. Clark, for appellant. Moss, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Commonwealth, 9 Ky. Op. 160, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 374 (Ky. Ct. App. 1876).

9 Ky. Op. 160 (Coleman v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Cambron
276 S.W. 113 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1925)