Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security

S.D. New York

Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 22, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-00076·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAROLYND.COLEMAN, Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 0076 (KHP) -V- JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated October 21, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court’s decision Carr v. Saul, 141 S. Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. Here, an Appointments Clause claim was raised during the pendency of this case. Accordingly, on remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate plaintiffs claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision. Dated: New York, New York October 22, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Cours) BY: D □□

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAROLYND.COLEMAN, Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 0076 (KHP) -V- JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated October 21, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court’s decision Carr v. Saul, 141 S. Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. Here, an Appointments Clause claim was raised during the pendency of this case. Accordingly, on remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate plaintiffs claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision. Dated: New York, New York October 22, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Cours) BY: D □□

Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security (Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related