Coleman v. Coleman

Ohio Supreme Court

Coleman v. Coleman

671 N.E.2d 264, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2060

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 25, 1996

Docket96-1325

StatusPublished

This text of 671 N.E.2d 264 (Coleman v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Coleman, 671 N.E.2d 264, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2060 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-95-215. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. On June 7,1996, when the appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $40 was submitted by Edward Coleman to satisfy the requirement of the docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1). This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the state of Ohio that the check was returned from General Mills Toledo Federal Credit Union because the cheek had an unauthorized drawer’s signature. Whereas R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) require that [1433]*1433the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a case is docketed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, effective October 24,1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-95-215. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. On June 7,1996, when the appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $40 was submitted by Edward Coleman to satisfy the requirement of the docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1). This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the state of Ohio that the check was returned from General Mills Toledo Federal Credit Union because the cheek had an unauthorized drawer’s signature. Whereas R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) require that [1433]*1433the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a case is docketed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, effective October 24,1996.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 N.E.2d 264, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-coleman-ohio-1996.