Coleman v. Coleman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Coleman v. Coleman

43 Haw. 209, 1959 Haw. LEXIS 104

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedApril 14, 1959

DocketNo. 4034

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Haw. 209 (Coleman v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Coleman, 43 Haw. 209, 1959 Haw. LEXIS 104 (haw 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the wife from a decree of divorce awarded to the husband on the ground of grievous mental suffering. The principal question for decision is whether the circuit court properly granted the divorce on the evidence adduced. The testimony of the husband supports the decision. The circuit court gave credence to the testimony. The decision will not be reversed unless it is palpably contrary to the evidence. We cannot say that [210]*210it is. (Burkett v. Burkett, 42 Haw. 264, 267.) We find no merit in other errors specified by appellent.

John F. Alexander (also on the opening brief; no reply brief filed) for appellant. Robert A. Franklin (Hyman M. Greenstein with him on the brief) for appellee.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the wife from a decree of divorce awarded to the husband on the ground of grievous mental suffering. The principal question for decision is whether the circuit court properly granted the divorce on the evidence adduced. The testimony of the husband supports the decision. The circuit court gave credence to the testimony. The decision will not be reversed unless it is palpably contrary to the evidence. We cannot say that [210]*210it is. (Burkett v. Burkett, 42 Haw. 264, 267.) We find no merit in other errors specified by appellent.

John F. Alexander (also on the opening brief; no reply brief filed) for appellant. Robert A. Franklin (Hyman M. Greenstein with him on the brief) for appellee.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Haw. 209, 1959 Haw. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-coleman-haw-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack