Coleman v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Coleman v. Clark

276 S.E.2d 911, 157 Ga. App. 119, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1649

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 14, 1981

Docket58916

StatusPublished

This text of 276 S.E.2d 911 (Coleman v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Clark, 276 S.E.2d 911, 157 Ga. App. 119, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1649 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

In Coleman v. Clark, 154 Ga. App. 188 (267 SE2d 824) (1980), this court affirmed the denial of Mrs. Coleman’s motion for directed verdict but reversed the grant of a directed verdict in favor of Colt Industries Operating Corporation against Mrs. Coleman on her cross-claim. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed that portion of our judgment which reversed the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of Colt. The Supreme Court specifically reinstated the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to Colt on the issue of degree of negligence and indemnification. Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in its entirety.

Judgment affírmed.

Deen, P. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

In Coleman v. Clark, 154 Ga. App. 188 (267 SE2d 824) (1980), this court affirmed the denial of Mrs. Coleman’s motion for directed verdict but reversed the grant of a directed verdict in favor of Colt Industries Operating Corporation against Mrs. Coleman on her cross-claim. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed that portion of our judgment which reversed the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of Colt. The Supreme Court specifically reinstated the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to Colt on the issue of degree of negligence and indemnification. Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in its entirety.

Judgment affírmed.

Deen, P. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.E.2d 911, 157 Ga. App. 119, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-clark-gactapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack