Coleman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coleman v. City of New York

37 A.D.2d 764, 324 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 764 (Coleman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. City of New York, 37 A.D.2d 764, 324 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 25, 1970, for the plaintiff in the amount of $90,954.89, after a jury trial, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The admission of the evidence of acquittal was undoubtedly to counter the prejudicial remarks in the opening made on behalf of defendant-appellant. Even if the admission of the acquittal evidence was error (cf. Schindler v. Royal Ins. Co., 258 N. Y. 310), the Trial Judge in his charge to the jury, stated, without exception, “The fact that the plaintiff was subsequently acquitted of the charge would not be relevant and must be disregarded by you.” There was no further request to charge and no motion had been made for a mistrial. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 25, 1970, for the plaintiff in the amount of $90,954.89, after a jury trial, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The admission of the evidence of acquittal was undoubtedly to counter the prejudicial remarks in the opening made on behalf of defendant-appellant. Even if the admission of the acquittal evidence was error (cf. Schindler v. Royal Ins. Co., 258 N. Y. 310), the Trial Judge in his charge to the jury, stated, without exception, “The fact that the plaintiff was subsequently acquitted of the charge would not be relevant and must be disregarded by you.” There was no further request to charge and no motion had been made for a mistrial. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 764, 324 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack