Coleman v. California
317 U.S. 596, 63 S. Ct. 162
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 9, 1942
DocketNo. 491
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases
This text of 317 U.S. 596 (Coleman v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coleman v. California, 317 U.S. 596, 63 S. Ct. 162 (1942).
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Troche v. California, 280 U. S. 524.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morgan v. Krenke
72 F. Supp. 2d 980 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)
Carrie C. Wong v. Christine Money, Warden Attorney General of the State of Ohio
142 F.3d 313 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
State v. Wong
641 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
State v. Brom
463 N.W.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1990)
Brian L. Haas v. Gordon Abrahamson, Superintendent of the Dodge Correctional Institute
910 F.2d 384 (Seventh Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Pohlot, Stephen
827 F.2d 889 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections
738 F.2d 1573 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. Israel
715 F.2d 1124 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Leick v. People
281 P.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
317 U.S. 596, 63 S. Ct. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-california-scotus-1942.