Coleman v. California
317 U.S. 596, 63 S. Ct. 162
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Troche v. California, 280 U. S. 524.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. California, 317 U.S. 596, 63 S. Ct. 162 (1942).
317 U.S. 596 (Coleman v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morgan v. Krenke
72 F. Supp. 2d 980 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)
Carrie C. Wong v. Christine Money, Warden Attorney General of the State of Ohio
142 F.3d 313 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
State v. Wong
641 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
State v. Brom
463 N.W.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1990)
Brian L. Haas v. Gordon Abrahamson, Superintendent of the Dodge Correctional Institute
910 F.2d 384 (Seventh Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Pohlot, Stephen
827 F.2d 889 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections
738 F.2d 1573 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. Israel
715 F.2d 1124 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Leick v. People
281 P.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)