Coleman v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court

Coleman v. Board of Parole

DecidedOctober 22, 1998

DocketS43893

StatusPublished

This text of Coleman v. Board of Parole (Coleman v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Board of Parole, (Or. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED: October 22, 1998

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

RICHARD RENE COLEMAN,

Petitioner on Review,

v.

BOARD OF PAROLE AND
POST-PRISON SUPERVISION,

Respondent on Review.

(CA A89645; SC S43893)

On petition for review from the Court of Appeals filed January 2, 1997.*

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

No appearance contra.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson Justices. **

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 485, ____ P2d ____ (1998).

*Judicial review from Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 144 Or App 487, 927 P2d 622 (1996).

**Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI