Coleman v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Coleman v. Angelone

40 F. App'x 778

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2002·No. No. 02-6268·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maurice A. Coleman appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Coleman v. Angelone, No. CA-01-350-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Maurice A. Coleman appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Coleman v. Angelone, No. CA-01-350-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Coleman v. Angelone, 40 F. App'x 778 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

40 F. App'x 778 (Coleman v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related