Coleman v. Am. Gen. Financial Servs.

893 N.E.2d 515, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1443
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2008·No. 2008-1009·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 89311, 2008-0hio-1403. Discretionary appeal accepted, and briefing shall proceed in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

This cause shall be consolidated for oral argument with 2008-0905, Alexander v. Wells Fargo Financial Ohio 1, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 89277, 2008-0hio-1402. Appellants in these causes collectively will share 20 minutes for oral argument, as will appellees.

Moyer, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. [1444] O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Am. Gen. Financial Servs., 893 N.E.2d 515, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2008).

893 N.E.2d 515 (Coleman v. Am. Gen. Financial Servs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.