Coleman v. Altec, Inc.

Opinion

. “IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA - WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:16-CV-954-D □ ~

LEROY COLEMAN, JR., ) . :

Pini, ) □

v. ; ORDER ALTEC, INC., ; '

eee / □

It is that time of year again. ‘Leroy Coleman, Jr. has returned with his annual motion to “throw out the settlement. See [D.E. 92]; cf. [D.E. 77] (2019 motion); [D.E. 81] (2020 motion); □□ [D.E. 90] (2021 motion). As always, the document contin baseless accusations against the mediator and the undersigned. See [D.E. 92]. The parties settled the action, and the settlement terms are clear. See Hensley v. Alcon Lab’ys, Inc., 277 F.3d 535, 540 (4th Cir. 2002); Moore v. Beaufort Cnty., 936 F.2d 159, 163-64 (4th Cir’ 1991); Millner v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 643 F.2d 1005, 1009 (4th Cir. 1981). The motion [D.E. 92] is DENIED as baseless. The case remains closed. SO ORDERED. This _{ 5 day of July, 2022.

od . Naver J SC. DEVER II United States District Judge