Coleman v. Allen

26 Ky. 229, 3 J.J. Marsh. 229, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 11, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ky. 229 (Coleman v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. Allen, 26 Ky. 229, 3 J.J. Marsh. 229, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1830).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the opinionof the Court.

It was material in this case to ascertain whether the interest in the estate loaned, was payable in specie or p„p„.

The testimony of Mrs. Coleman, might have (ended, in some degree, to aid the jury m determining that tact; and was, therefore, competent.

íf the interest .of Mary Ann, might have been exacted from the executor,-in specie, still she may have agreed, and on a sufficient consideration, to accept commonwealths paper for it.

The record does not shew, positively, when the dontraet of loan was made.

And, therefore, in this latter respect, also, the rejected evidence might have some effect.

■ Therefore, the judgment ijs reversed and the canse remanded, for a new (rial.

Note. Judge Underivood did not si.t in (his case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ky. 229, 3 J.J. Marsh. 229, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-allen-kyctapp-1830.