Coleman, Lisa Ann

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 31, 2010
• Docket: WR-72,094-01
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-72,094-01 EX PARTE LISA ANN COLEMAN

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE

NO. 1016470R IN THE 297^TH CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT

TARRANT COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071.

On June 21, 2006, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Coleman v. State, No. AP-75,478 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 9, 2009) (not designated for publication).

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall determine whether applicant's trial counsel interviewed Marcela Williams. If trial counsel did not, the trial court shall determine why trial counsel did not do so. If counsel did interview Marcela Williams, the trial court shall determine why Marcela Williams was not called to testify. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.071 §§ 8 or 9.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether applicant's trial counsel interviewed Marcela Williams. If trial counsel did not do so, the trial court shall make findings of fact regarding the reasons trial counsel did not do so. If trial counsel did interview Marcela Williams, the trial court shall make findings of fact addressing why Marcela Williams was not called to testify. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 31^ST DAY OF MARCH, 2010.

Do Not Publish