COLEMAN, BRUCE v. TREMARCO CORP.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

COLEMAN, BRUCE v. TREMARCO CORP.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2017

DocketCA 16-01910

StatusPublished

This text of COLEMAN, BRUCE v. TREMARCO CORP. (COLEMAN, BRUCE v. TREMARCO CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

COLEMAN, BRUCE v. TREMARCO CORP., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

551 CA 16-01910 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

BRUCE COLEMAN AND ROCHESTER AUTO MAINTENANCE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. AND TREMARCO CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (ALAN J. KNAUF OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (BERYL NUSBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered March 4, 2016. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for public nuisance and loss of sale proceeds and dismissing all claims by plaintiff Rochester Auto Maintenance, Inc., and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI