Colegrove v. Barrett

Supreme Court

Colegrove v. Barrett

330 U.S. 804, 67 S. Ct. 973, 91 L. Ed. 1262, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2556

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 10, 1947

DocketNo. 1031

StatusPublished

Cited by31 cases

This text of 330 U.S. 804 (Colegrove v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colegrove v. Barrett, 330 U.S. 804, 67 S. Ct. 973, 91 L. Ed. 1262, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2556 (1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. In view of the Court's refusal to grant rehearing in Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 825, 828, and its dismissal of the appeals in Cook v. Fortson and Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U. S. 675, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 829, Mr. Justice Rutledge concurs in the dismissal of this appeal. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. In view of the Court's refusal to grant rehearing in Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 825, 828, and its dismissal of the appeals in Cook v. Fortson and Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U. S. 675, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 829, Mr. Justice Rutledge concurs in the dismissal of this appeal. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 U.S. 804, 67 S. Ct. 973, 91 L. Ed. 1262, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colegrove-v-barrett-scotus-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack