Cole v. Wright

1 How. Pr. 132
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 132 (Cole v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Wright, 1 How. Pr. 132 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Held that the answer to the motion was conclusive against the defendant, but as defendant’s counsel desired an opportunity to explain, he would deny it without prejudice.

Decision.—Motion denied, with costs, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-wright-nysupct-1845.