Cole v. Thayer
25 Mich. 212, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 101
Opinion
held that tbe stipulation would preclude said Luman aud Hiram Jenison from suing out this writ of error, and as tbe writ is sued out in tbeir name jointly with that of said Cole, the writ must be dismissed. If Cole desired to review the judgment he should have sued out a sole writ in his own behalf, in accordance with rule 35 of this court.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cole v. Thayer, 25 Mich. 212, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 101 (Mich. 1872).
25 Mich. 212 (Cole v. Thayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collier v. Pruzinsky
730 N.W.2d 243 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co.
173 F. 577 (Ninth Circuit, 1909)