Cole v. Texas

499 U.S. 1301, 111 S. Ct. 1407, 113 L. Ed. 2d 206, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1712
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1991·No. A-704 (90-7411)·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Justice Scalia,

Circuit Justice.

I have before me an application for a stay of execution pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. The petitioner seeks direct review of the judgment of the Texas courts affirming his death sentence.

I will in this case, and in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this Court of the petition for certiorari. While I will not extend the time for filing a petition beyond an established execution date, see Madden v. Texas, 498 U. S. 1301 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers), neither will I permit the State’s execution date to interfere with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Texas, 499 U.S. 1301, 111 S. Ct. 1407, 113 L. Ed. 2d 206, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1712 (1991).

499 U.S. 1301 (Cole v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sara Edmondson v. Lilliston Ford Inc
593 F. App'x 108 (Third Circuit, 2014)
In Re Stays of Execution in Capital Cases
471 S.E.2d 140 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
Rodriguez v. Texas
515 U.S. 1307 (Supreme Court, 1995)