Cole v. Texas

499 U.S. 1301, 111 S. Ct. 1407, 113 L. Ed. 2d 206, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1712
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1991
DocketA-704 (90-7411)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 499 U.S. 1301 (Cole v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Texas, 499 U.S. 1301, 111 S. Ct. 1407, 113 L. Ed. 2d 206, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1712 (1991).

Opinion

Justice Scalia,

Circuit Justice.

I have before me an application for a stay of execution pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. The petitioner seeks direct review of the judgment of the Texas courts affirming his death sentence.

I will in this case, and in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this Court of the petition for certiorari. While I will not extend the time for filing a petition beyond an established execution date, see Madden v. Texas, 498 U. S. 1301 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers), neither will I permit the State’s execution date to interfere with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sara Edmondson v. Lilliston Ford Inc
593 F. App'x 108 (Third Circuit, 2014)
In Re Stays of Execution in Capital Cases
471 S.E.2d 140 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
Rodriguez v. Texas
515 U.S. 1307 (Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
499 U.S. 1301, 111 S. Ct. 1407, 113 L. Ed. 2d 206, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-texas-scotus-1991.