Cole v. Syracuse Community Health Center, Inc.
This text of 209 A.D.2d 1005 (Cole v. Syracuse Community Health Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Because questions of fact at least arguably exist whether the continuous treatment doctrine tolled the Statute of Limitations and whether the treatment of decedent at the Syracuse Community Health Center can be imputed to defendant Leslie Emsden (see, e.g., Kearney v GVGHA, 125 Misc 2d 716, affd 115 AD2d 960; see also, Watkins v Fromm, 108 AD2d 233), the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 1005, 619 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-syracuse-community-health-center-inc-nyappdiv-1994.