Cole v. Syracuse Community Health Center, Inc.

209 A.D.2d 1005, 619 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12030
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 1005 (Cole v. Syracuse Community Health Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Syracuse Community Health Center, Inc., 209 A.D.2d 1005, 619 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12030 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Because questions of fact at least arguably exist whether the continuous treatment doctrine tolled the Statute of Limitations and whether the treatment of decedent at the Syracuse Community Health Center can be imputed to defendant Leslie Emsden (see, e.g., Kearney v GVGHA, 125 Misc 2d 716, affd 115 AD2d 960; see also, Watkins v Fromm, 108 AD2d 233), the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GREEN, DENNIS v. ASSOCIATED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Green v. Associated Medical Professionals
111 A.D.3d 1430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 1005, 619 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-syracuse-community-health-center-inc-nyappdiv-1994.