Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION

767 N.W.2d 654, 483 Mich. 654, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1556
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 2009·No. 138552·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

767 N.W.2d 654 (2009)
483 Mich. 654

Merhonda COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, d/b/a Smart, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 138552. COA No. 288480.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 15, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, 767 N.W.2d 654, 483 Mich. 654, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1556 (Mich. 2009).

767 N.W.2d 654 (Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oakland County v. OAKLAND COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION
767 N.W.2d 654 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)