Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
767 N.W.2d 654, 483 Mich. 654, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1556
Opinion
Merhonda COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, d/b/a Smart, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, 767 N.W.2d 654, 483 Mich. 654, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1556 (Mich. 2009).
767 N.W.2d 654 (Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oakland County v. OAKLAND COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION
767 N.W.2d 654 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)