Cole v. State
This text of 9 Tex. 42 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wo can perceive no error in the charge, and believe that it is fully embraced in the decision of this court in the case of MeGaffe v. The State. (4 Tex. II., 150.) In that case the language of this court is, A room is a part of a house, and there cotild be no playing in a room without its being in the house of which the room formed a part. We believe that the charge given by the District Judge was in law correct and happily expressed. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Tex. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-tex-1852.