Cole v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cole v. State

93 S.E. 512, 21 Ga. App. 49, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 417

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 24, 1917

Docket8913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 512 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. State, 93 S.E. 512, 21 Ga. App. 49, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 417 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

It appearing, from the evidence, that in a cellar underneath the defendant’s house there was found about sixty gallons of beer, and on the window-sill there was found fresh beer spilled, and along the path leading from the cellar window to where an illicit still was in operation, on the premises of defendant, there were also signs of beer having been spilled, it was not error for the court to overrule a motion for a new trial upon the general grounds complaining of the conviction of the defendant upon an indictment charging him with manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Indictment for making intoxicating liquor; from Paulding superior court-^Judge Bartlett. April 14, 1917.

C. D. McGregor, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Hutcheson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

It appearing, from the evidence, that in a cellar underneath the defendant’s house there was found about sixty gallons of beer, and on the window-sill there was found fresh beer spilled, and along the path leading from the cellar window to where an illicit still was in operation, on the premises of defendant, there were also signs of beer having been spilled, it was not error for the court to overrule a motion for a new trial upon the general grounds complaining of the conviction of the defendant upon an indictment charging him with manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Indictment for making intoxicating liquor; from Paulding superior court-^Judge Bartlett. April 14, 1917.

C. D. McGregor, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Hutcheson, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E. 512, 21 Ga. App. 49, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack