Cole v. State

320 So. 2d 826
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 24, 1975
DocketNo. 74-1710
StatusPublished

This text of 320 So. 2d 826 (Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. State, 320 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the evidence clearly demonstrates a reasonable doubt as to the sanity of the defendant at the time of the offense so as to overcome the presumption of sanity. Byrd v. State, Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 22; Farrell v. State, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 130. A reasonable doubt having been raised and the state having failed to overcome it, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Cf. Powell v. Genung, Fla.1974, 306 So.2d 113.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byrd v. State
297 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Farrell v. State
101 So. 2d 130 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Powell v. Genung
306 So. 2d 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 So. 2d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.